2 min read

The Schedule M2RT Questionnaire on MN Trusts: What You Need to Know

The Schedule M2RT Questionnaire on MN Trusts: What You Need to Know

November 19, 2020 - If you're looking to transfer wealth, protect your assets, and manage taxes, trusts can help secure a stronger financial future for your business and family. State income tax implications can also affect the way you structure your trusts – and Minnesota's new Schedule M2RT Resident Trust Questionnaire could impact how the state taxes your trust.

Prior to 2018, if your trust met the statutory definition of a Minnesota resident trust, it would always be taxed as a MN resident trust. For instance, a trust created at the death of a MN resident would continue to be a MN resident trust even if the trust and its beneficiaries had no connections to the state.

Two court cases have challenged this interpretation: North Carolina Dept. of Revenue v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust (2019), decided by the US Supreme Court, and Fielding v. Commissioner of Revenue (2018), decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota. In these cases, the courts ruled that states must respect the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and establish a "definite link" between the state and the trust it seeks to tax.

These rulings mean new challenges, opportunities, and paperwork when establishing and managing trusts in the state of Minnesota.

How the Schedule M2RT Questionnaire Can Change the Way Your Trusts are Taxed

Schedule M2RT is Minnesota's attempt to establish that "definite link" between the state and the trusts, the people who form them, their beneficiaries, the assets they contain, and the trustees who administer them. Any fiduciary who meets "the statutory definition of a resident trust" but believes their trust doesn't have sufficient connections to Minnesota to be taxed as a resident must file Form M2RT with their tax return.

In other words, if the taxpayer feels that they don't meet the minimum connection with the state and the trust shouldn't be taxed in Minnesota, the taxpayer must now give evidence to prove it by completing the Schedule M2RT Resident Trust Questionnaire. It asks respondents to confirm the following details, among others:

  • Whether or not any trustees, grantors, and beneficiaries were Minnesota residents in the applicable tax year
  • Whether or not any administration of the trust took place in Minnesota during the tax year
  • How many of the trust's tangible or intangible assets were located in Minnesota at any time during the tax year, if any

From your answers, the Minnesota Department of Revenue can apply due process to make a determination about whether or not your trust should be taxed to Minnesota. If your trust is classified as a Minnesota resident trust and you don't file the Form M2RT questionnaire, it could be taxed as a Minnesota resident trust by default.

The Schedule M2RT Questionnaire Isn't a Test

It's important to note that the Schedule M2RT questionnaire isn't a test you pass or fail. It only exists to establish the facts of whether or not your trust qualifies as a Minnesota resident trust. Just like the Fielding case was a "facts and circumstances decision," each answer you give on the M2RT is simply another factor in determining the trust residency.

With an understanding of the details (like where, how, and when the trust is written, administered, and invested), your accounting advisor can help you figure out whether or not your trust is classifiable as a Minnesota resident trust.

For more information about the Schedule M2RT form or what you should do when establishing or managing a trust in Minnesota, reach out to me, Jon Fortin, J.D., Tax Director, Estate, Gift & Trust at Redpath and Company, at 651-478-1508 or jfortin@redpathcpas.com.

Bookkeeping Red Flags and What To Do About Them

Bookkeeping Red Flags and What To Do About Them

Bookkeeping is strategically important for every business because financials form the foundation for daily operations and future planning....

Read More
Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional. But for Whom?

Corporate Transparency Act Ruled Unconstitutional. But for Whom?

In a decision issued March 1, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Liles Burke ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional....

Read More
The Benefits of a Grantor-Retained Income Trust

The Benefits of a Grantor-Retained Income Trust

Several types of trusts can help you manage your assets in a way that supports your estate planning goals while providing potentially significant tax...

Read More